As you all know, EHR is present in modern health care, and it is here to stay.
That being said, it is not being welcomed by all, and many are criticizing EHR. Some doctors are less than thrilled with EHR capability and ease of use. But, while there is criticism, like with any new tool introduced into an industry, EHR is useful and changing modern health care for the better. Yes, EHR can be overwhelming and too much to handle at times for the physicians, but that is why medical scribes exist. Hiring scribes can help.
One doctor in particular discussed his thoughts on EHR in a recent article, and his comments were interesting and important, because they help us understand the physician perspective.
Dr. Danny Newman discussed EHR with Georgia Health News. He realizes that electronic health records are here to stay, and he has seen firsthand some of the benefits of replacing paper charts with electronic ones. He said that one advantage of EHR is electronic prescribing of medications, which he says reduces mix-ups caused by illegible or messy handwriting.
But, as mentioned above, we all know that physicians are still not thrilled with EHR, despite seeing some of the benefits associated with going electronic.
Newman highlights his frustration, saying, “They’re (EHR) supposed to be more efficient...but I think they’re less efficient”. According to the article, for Newman a patient visit now produces five pages of notes, instead of a single page in the pre-EHR days, and it takes about five minutes to fill in the EHR for one visit. Newman is pretty clear in his frustration with EHR, when he says, “It’s taking away time from my patients".
As Newman says, nowadays “Many doctors feel like they’re data entry clerks”.